Over 55 Law Firms Have Now Joined the Recent Statement on SPAC Litigation
by Kristi Marvin on 2021-08-30 at 10:57am

The list keeps growing….

In a follow-up to last week’s statement by leading law firms declaring that the recent lawsuits by former SEC commissioner and current NYU Law professor Robert Jackson and Yale Law School professor John Morley, were “without factual or legal basis”, an additional nine law firms have added their names to the list.

The now 58 total firms puts additional pressure on the lawsuit allegations that SPACs are “investment companies”.  Jackson and Morley have yet to comment.

You can find the full press release HERE along with an article this morning on DealBook recapping the recent events.


Over 55 of the Nation’s Leading Law Firms Respond to Investment Company Act Lawsuits Targeting the SPAC Industry

August 30, 2021

Recently a purported shareholder of certain special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) initiated derivative lawsuits asserting that the SPACs are investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, because proceeds from their initial public offerings are invested in short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds.

Under the provision of the 1940 Act relied upon in the lawsuits, an investment company is a company that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities.

SPACs, however, are engaged primarily in identifying and consummating a business combination with one or more operating companies within a specified period of time.  In connection with an initial business combination, SPAC investors may elect to remain invested in the combined company or get their money back. If a business combination is not completed in a specified period of time, investors also get their money back. Pending the earlier to occur of the completion of a business combination or the failure to complete a business combination within a specified timeframe, almost all of a SPAC’s assets are held in a trust account and limited to short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds.

Consistent with longstanding interpretations of the 1940 Act, and its plain statutory text, any company that temporarily holds short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds while engaging in its primary business of seeking a business combination with one or more operating companies is not an investment company under the 1940 Act.  As a result, more than 1,000 SPAC IPOs have been reviewed by the staff of the SEC over two decades and have not been deemed to be subject to the 1940 Act.

The undersigned law firms view the assertion that SPACs are investment companies as without factual or legal basis and believe that a SPAC is not an investment company under the 1940 Act if it (i) follows its stated business plan of seeking to identify and engage in a business combination with one or more operating companies within a specified period of time and (ii) holds short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds in its trust account pending completion of its initial business combination.[1]

None of the firms subscribing to this document intends hereby to give legal advice to any person. Any person seeking legal advice should consult with an attorney.

[1] Certain of these lawsuits also claim that personnel of the SPAC sponsor are acting as unregistered investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by advising on the SPAC business combination (which the plaintiff incorrectly asserts constitutes advice as to investing in, purchasing, or selling securities).  The law firms listed herein also view this claim as without legal basis and do not believe that such personnel or the SPAC sponsor are unregistered investment advisers.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Arnold & Porter
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Baker Botts LLP
Blank Rome LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Clifford Chance US LLP
Cooley LLP
Covington & Burling LLP
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Fenwick & West LLP
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Graubard Miller
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
King & Spalding LLP
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Mayer Brown LLP
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Milbank LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Paul Hastings LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Perkins Coie LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Reed Smith LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Schiff Hardin LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Sidley Austin LLP
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Vinson & Elkins LLP
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
White & Case LLP
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
Winston & Strawn LLP

 

 

Recent Posts
by Kristi Marvin on 2024-06-22 at 11:30am

Terms Tracker for the Week Ending June 21, 2024 Programming Note: An abbreviated version of the Terms Tracker will be posted next week.  In light of the end of the quarter, we will be busy putting together our Half-Year report which should be posted the first week of July.  Welcome to our weekly column where...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-06-21 at 11:46am

Future Vision II (NASDAQ:FVNNU) has filed for a $50 million IPO to hunt for a TMT target in Asia including intelligent chips, 5G and other emerging technologies there. Given the heightened competition and trade protectionism around these technologies lately, it is interesting that Future Vision II hasn’t ruled out combining with a Chinese target. In...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-06-21 at 8:12am

At the SPAC of Dawn Every public company wants retail investor engagement, but once brought along, those investors require a bit of educating as well. Nuclear fission firm Oklo (NYSE:OKLO) is discovering that this week as it made a point to put out a press release explaining that its most recent S-1 filing was a...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-06-20 at 3:41pm

Voyager (NASDAQ:VASHU) has filed for a SPAC IPO featuring many of the now increasingly familiar terms pushed by underwriter Cantor Fitzgerald over the past month, but does include a novel dollar figure for its raise at $261 million, before any over-allotments. Outside of this, Voyager’s trust is funded to 100.00% with $10.00 per unit to...

by Kristi Marvin on 2024-06-20 at 12:29pm

Eleven new SPACs have filed since the beginning of June, and the number is 12 if we count the May 31st filing of Graf Global Corp.  Seven of those 12 are being underwritten by Cantor, which has always been a very active SPAC underwriter. But you know who else used to be very active? Credit...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved