Over 55 Law Firms Have Now Joined the Recent Statement on SPAC Litigation
by Kristi Marvin on 2021-08-30 at 10:57am

The list keeps growing….

In a follow-up to last week’s statement by leading law firms declaring that the recent lawsuits by former SEC commissioner and current NYU Law professor Robert Jackson and Yale Law School professor John Morley, were “without factual or legal basis”, an additional nine law firms have added their names to the list.

The now 58 total firms puts additional pressure on the lawsuit allegations that SPACs are “investment companies”.  Jackson and Morley have yet to comment.

You can find the full press release HERE along with an article this morning on DealBook recapping the recent events.


Over 55 of the Nation’s Leading Law Firms Respond to Investment Company Act Lawsuits Targeting the SPAC Industry

August 30, 2021

Recently a purported shareholder of certain special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) initiated derivative lawsuits asserting that the SPACs are investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, because proceeds from their initial public offerings are invested in short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds.

Under the provision of the 1940 Act relied upon in the lawsuits, an investment company is a company that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities.

SPACs, however, are engaged primarily in identifying and consummating a business combination with one or more operating companies within a specified period of time.  In connection with an initial business combination, SPAC investors may elect to remain invested in the combined company or get their money back. If a business combination is not completed in a specified period of time, investors also get their money back. Pending the earlier to occur of the completion of a business combination or the failure to complete a business combination within a specified timeframe, almost all of a SPAC’s assets are held in a trust account and limited to short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds.

Consistent with longstanding interpretations of the 1940 Act, and its plain statutory text, any company that temporarily holds short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds while engaging in its primary business of seeking a business combination with one or more operating companies is not an investment company under the 1940 Act.  As a result, more than 1,000 SPAC IPOs have been reviewed by the staff of the SEC over two decades and have not been deemed to be subject to the 1940 Act.

The undersigned law firms view the assertion that SPACs are investment companies as without factual or legal basis and believe that a SPAC is not an investment company under the 1940 Act if it (i) follows its stated business plan of seeking to identify and engage in a business combination with one or more operating companies within a specified period of time and (ii) holds short-term treasuries and qualifying money market funds in its trust account pending completion of its initial business combination.[1]

None of the firms subscribing to this document intends hereby to give legal advice to any person. Any person seeking legal advice should consult with an attorney.

[1] Certain of these lawsuits also claim that personnel of the SPAC sponsor are acting as unregistered investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by advising on the SPAC business combination (which the plaintiff incorrectly asserts constitutes advice as to investing in, purchasing, or selling securities).  The law firms listed herein also view this claim as without legal basis and do not believe that such personnel or the SPAC sponsor are unregistered investment advisers.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Arnold & Porter
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Baker Botts LLP
Blank Rome LLP
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Clifford Chance US LLP
Cooley LLP
Covington & Burling LLP
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Fenwick & West LLP
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Graubard Miller
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
King & Spalding LLP
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Mayer Brown LLP
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Milbank LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Paul Hastings LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Perkins Coie LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Reed Smith LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Schiff Hardin LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Sidley Austin LLP
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Vinson & Elkins LLP
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
White & Case LLP
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
Winston & Strawn LLP

 

 

Recent Posts
by Anthony Sozzi on 2024-11-01 at 3:47pm

October continued the recent trend of SPAC teams seeking additional extensions beyond their first one, as they work on closing their combinations with the remaining funds after redemptions. Meanwhile, new SPACs are launching IPOs and beginning their search processes, signaling a shift in the market. Extension Votes In October, there were 13 scheduled extension votes....

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-11-01 at 3:37pm

K&F Growth II (NASDAQ:KFIIU) has filed for a $250 million IPO with aggressive terms and a laser focus on hospitality and gaming targets. The SPAC comes to market with a 24-month initial search clock and a trust that is not overfunded. This makes it only the second of underwriter BTIG’s nine SPACs filed in 2024...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-11-01 at 8:26am

At the SPAC of Dawn During a day of Halloween parties, SPACs adopted a one in, one out policy with two fresh SPACs pricing their IPOs just as two others opted to exit the club via liquidation. Given that the two new SPACs, Bleichroeder I (NASDAQ:BACQU) and Newbury Street II (NASDAQ:NTWOU), will begin trading later...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2024-10-31 at 7:39pm

Bleichroeder Acquisition Corp. I (Nasdaq: BACQU), announced the pricing of its $250 million IPO and its units are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “BACQU”, Friday, November 1, 2024. The new SPAC intends to focus their efforts on businesses in the technology, media and telecommunications (“TMT”) sector as well as sectors...

by Kristi Marvin on 2024-10-31 at 7:36pm

Newbury Street II Acquisition Corp (Nasdaq: NTWOU), announced the pricing of its $150 million IPO and its units are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “NTWOU”, Friday, November 1, 2024. The new SPAC intends to capitalize on the deal making and business building experience of their management team when conducting the...

logo

Copyright © 2023 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved