Treasury Issues Guidance on Buybacks. What Does It Mean For SPACs?
by Kristi Marvin on 2022-12-27 at 4:54pm

This morning the treasury department finally issued guidance around the issue of share buybacks, which has been haunting the capital markets since August when the 1% excise tax was first introduced. And in the nick of time too, since the tax goes into effect in less than week.

To be clear, the purpose of the excise tax was never about SPACs, they just got caught in its crosshairs thanks to the SPAC’s redemption feature. However, for some context around the situation, the 1% excise tax came about as part of the Inflation Reduction Bill that was passed this summer. Senator Kyrsten Sinema, in a last minute change, insisted the tax increase on carried interest for private equity be removed and instead, as a concession, the 1% excise tax on stock buybacks was put in.

On its surface, it appeared to be specifically meant for the typical share buyback you think of when corporations literally buy back their stock. However, all sorts of asset classes were caught up in it and affected such as redeemable preferreds and SPACs since a “redemption” is considered a buyback as well. There was quite a bit of confusion as to its interpretation and so, here we are today with the Treasury Department putting out some much needed guidance for how companies should proceed. However, in typical government fashion, it’s about as clear as a foggy windshield in blizzard.

Nonetheless, it appears that SPACs undergoing a “complete liquidation” will be spared the excise tax. To wit:

(i) Complete liquidations. 
 (A) General rule. Except as provided in section 3.04(4)(a)(v) of this notice, a distribution in complete liquidation of a covered corporation or a covered surrogate foreign corporation (as appropriate) to which § 331 or § 332(a) applies is not a repurchase by the covered corporation or the covered surrogate foreign corporation. 
 (B) Distributions during taxable year of complete liquidation and dissolution. 18 If a covered corporation or a covered surrogate foreign corporation (as appropriate) completely liquidates and dissolves (within the meaning of § 1.331-1(d)(1)(ii)) during a taxable year (that is, has a final distribution in complete liquidation to which § 331 applies during that taxable year), no distribution by that covered corporation or covered surrogate foreign corporation during that taxable year is a repurchase…
What is less clear is what happens in a partial redemption, i.e., at a shareholder vote for either extension or completion.  In those cases, the entire trust is not redeemed, only partially.  That is not well defined and so, we’re in yet another gray area.
Nonetheless, for SPACs that made a mad dash to liquidate before the December 31, 2022 excise tax deadline….well, apparently there was no need to rush. It looks like they will not be subject to the excise tax.  However, going forward, if “partial” redemptions via extension votes or completion votes do turn out to be subject to the tax (after we get further clarity), there could be another short term incentive for SPAC teams to opt to liquidate rather than press on. Meaning, if a SPAC team is running out of time, in a very difficult capital markets climate, and the option is to liquidate with no penalty or extend via shareholder vote and potentially be subject to a tax with average redemptions at votes hovering around 85%, which path is going to look more attractive?
Keep in mind, however, that this excise tax is only going to affect existing SPACs since any new SPACs that IPO will instead opt for an offshore domicile such as a Cayman or BVI. Foreign domiciled SPACs would not be subject to the excise tax. But, we still have roughly 384 SPACs still searching and another 148 that are announced. Of those, 281 are domestic SPACs that would potentially be affected.
So while today’s guidance is good news in that it appears to resolve the excise tax issue of what happens in a liquidation, there are still some questions and language that the auditors and lawyers need to parse.  Stay tuned as we try and gather more info.

 

Recent Posts
by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-04-30 at 8:20am

At the SPAC of Dawn Now that earnings season is in full swing, more de-SPACs are set to provide updates on how both trade and market volatility are impacting their margins. On the positive side, USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ:USAR) has continued to reap the benefits from its position as one of few US-based producers of...

by Kristi Marvin on 2025-04-30 at 7:08am

This week, we sit down with Rick Hendrix and Adam Fishman from the Live Oak SPAC team. Rick Hendrix is the Founder of Live Oak Merchant Partners, and Chairman and CEO of Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V (NASDAQ:LOKV). In addition, he is an operating executive at Crestview Partners, a New York-based middle market focused private equity firm....

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-04-29 at 7:03pm

Berto Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:TACOU) announced the pricing of its upsized $261 million IPO and its units are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “TACOU”, Wednesday, April 30, 2025. The new SPAC aims to conduct a broad search for a target but will have a particular interest in artificial intelligence, wellness, longevity,...

by Nicholas Alan Clayton on 2025-04-29 at 6:20pm

Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. (NASDAQ:LCCCU) announced the pricing of its $60 million IPO and its units are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “LCCCU”, Wednesday, April 30, 2025. The new SPAC aims to conduct a broad search for a target with a team that has previously closed business combinations in the...

by Kristi Marvin on 2025-04-29 at 3:35pm

Churchill Capital Corp X (NASDAQ:CCCXU) has filed for a $300 million SPAC with a broad search focus, to add to the portfolio of Churchill deals. Five Churchill deals have closed (I, II, III, IV, and AltC), while V, VI and VII liquidated in the SPAC downturn. However, keep in mind that the Churchill team still...

logo

Copyright © 2025 SPACInsider, Inc. All Rights Reserved